


 



.jpg) Well out of all thee animals we have dissected so far thee all have organs and skin. A cray fish has an anus just like a starfish and a worm. They are all located in similar places toward thee bottom of thee animal. However many of thee animals have eyes as well. For example a cray fish has two eyes like a perch however, a grasshopper has 3 eyes called simple eyes. Also in a cray fish they have gills instead of lungs unlike a grasshopper. A grasshopper is a land creature so it has lungs not gills. Only animals who live in water have gilla exception to alligators.
 Well out of all thee animals we have dissected so far thee all have organs and skin. A cray fish has an anus just like a starfish and a worm. They are all located in similar places toward thee bottom of thee animal. However many of thee animals have eyes as well. For example a cray fish has two eyes like a perch however, a grasshopper has 3 eyes called simple eyes. Also in a cray fish they have gills instead of lungs unlike a grasshopper. A grasshopper is a land creature so it has lungs not gills. Only animals who live in water have gilla exception to alligators.
 My bird experience was awsome I obtained a lot food because I had a spoon. I had to fight for thee food I wanted but most of thee time I won becuase i was very aggresive more then thee other birds!:) I did very well getting my food, a spoon beak is the best beak you can have.
 My bird experience was awsome I obtained a lot food because I had a spoon. I had to fight for thee food I wanted but most of thee time I won becuase i was very aggresive more then thee other birds!:) I did very well getting my food, a spoon beak is the best beak you can have.
The terms food chain and food web both refer to groups of organisms that are dependent on each other for food. A food chain is a single series of organisms in which each plant or animal depends on the organism above or below it. As an example, a food chain might consist of garden plants, such as lettuce and carrots, fed upon by rabbits which, in turn, are fed upon by owls which, in turn, are fed upon by hawks.
The feeding relationships of organisms in the real world is almost always more complex than suggested by a food chain. For that reason, the term food web can effect other animals. A food web differs from a food chain in that it includes all the organisms whose feeding habits are related in some way or another to those of other organisms. In the example above, small animals other than rabbits feed on lettuce and carrots and, in turn, those animals are fed upon by a variety of larger animals.
 I would choose the mesolithic era is most important  because Mesolithic means "Middle Stone Age. However, the prefix "meso-" in the word can mean "between," and this has been taken some scientists to refer to cultures in between a hunter-gathering mode and an agricultural mode. The Mesolithic era begins at the end of the Pleistocene epoch and the start of the Holocene, the most recent geologic epoch. Prior to the Mesolithic era, mile-thick continental glaciers covered most of Eurasia and North America. Any terrain north of 50 °N was essentially uninhabitable, until the ice melted around 11,000 years ago. Global temperatures increased, making life easier for humans worldwide. By the Mesolithic, humans had already spread across the entire world, except for Antarctica and a few remote islands. The Americas and Australia were fully colonized. The Mesolithic era was an unusual transition time between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic. Because the period was relatively short, Mesolithic artifacts are relatively hard to come by, consisting mainly of middens, or scrap-heaps. In coastal areas around the world, there are large shell middens dating to the Mesolithic era. In British Columbia, there is a midden several meters in depth which has been around for at least 10,000 years. Mesolithic cultures were about as advanced as you could get before establishing agriculture and cities. They hunted animals with a variety of bows and spears, and drove most of the world's megafauna  to extinction. Like civilizations before them, they survived through a mix of hunting and gathering, although may have begun to intentionally plant the seeds of edible plants in fertile soils, pulling out the weeds.
 I would choose the mesolithic era is most important  because Mesolithic means "Middle Stone Age. However, the prefix "meso-" in the word can mean "between," and this has been taken some scientists to refer to cultures in between a hunter-gathering mode and an agricultural mode. The Mesolithic era begins at the end of the Pleistocene epoch and the start of the Holocene, the most recent geologic epoch. Prior to the Mesolithic era, mile-thick continental glaciers covered most of Eurasia and North America. Any terrain north of 50 °N was essentially uninhabitable, until the ice melted around 11,000 years ago. Global temperatures increased, making life easier for humans worldwide. By the Mesolithic, humans had already spread across the entire world, except for Antarctica and a few remote islands. The Americas and Australia were fully colonized. The Mesolithic era was an unusual transition time between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic. Because the period was relatively short, Mesolithic artifacts are relatively hard to come by, consisting mainly of middens, or scrap-heaps. In coastal areas around the world, there are large shell middens dating to the Mesolithic era. In British Columbia, there is a midden several meters in depth which has been around for at least 10,000 years. Mesolithic cultures were about as advanced as you could get before establishing agriculture and cities. They hunted animals with a variety of bows and spears, and drove most of the world's megafauna  to extinction. Like civilizations before them, they survived through a mix of hunting and gathering, although may have begun to intentionally plant the seeds of edible plants in fertile soils, pulling out the weeds.

The different types of natural selection are directional selection, disruptive selection, and Stabilizing selection. In directional selection, one extreme of the trait distribution experiences selection against it. The result is that the population's trait distribution shifts toward the other extreme. In the case of such selection, the mean of the population graph shifts. Using the familiar example of giraffe necks, there was a selection pressure against short necks, since individuals with short necks could not reach as many leaves on which to feed. As a result, the distribution of neck length shifted to favor individuals with long necks.In disruptive selection, selection pressures act against individuals in the middle of the trait distribution. The result is a bimodal, or two-peaked, curve in which the two extremes of the curve create their own smaller curves. For example, imagine a plant of extremely variable height that is pollinated by three different pollinators, one that was attracted to short plants, another that preferred plants of medium height and a third that visited only the tallest plants. If the pollinator that preferred plants of medium height disappeared from an area, medium height plants would be selected against and the population would tend toward both short and tall, but not medium height plants. Stabilizing selection is when natural selection works against the two extremes of a trait to make the population more uniform. For example, stabilizing selection might work on the birth weight of human babies to keep them at an intermediate weight, because babies that are too big or too small have less chance of being born healthy.

Darwin's theory was revolutionary because it banished the concept of intelligent design from biology, consigning it to a marginal theological ghetto. For the first time, there seemed to be a plausible materialistic explanation for all those ingenious biological mechanisms -- the brain and the eye, digestion and circulation, feathers and fins.
Others extended Darwin's ban on intelligent design to include the origin of life and the universe itself. With help from intellectuals such as Marx and Freud, we were left with a view of humans as mere animals or machines who inhabit a universe ruled by chance, and whose behavior and thoughts are determined by the immutable and impersonal forces of nature and environment.





 No we should not clone full humans because human cloning would bring risks of abuses to human dignity by unscrupulous people. Also if for example a scientist did clone a human how would thee clone emotionally feel. Would the clone feel like a fake person or a human, would he be deined for being a clone, or would he not make friends at school. There also may be physical risks for example To repeat the same thing on humans would be giving both the mother and the potential foetus a high risk of damage. The basic science of fusing the cytoplasm and nucleus to the cell is very poorly understood. How many abnormal babies would have to be produced to get one right? There are t unknowns about physical problems in pregnancy with cloned sheep and cattle to suggest that human cloning experiments would violate normal medical practice. Roslin researchers have said that there is no experiment that could be done to prove the safety of human clonig without casuing serious risk to humans in the process. Then there are also unknown factors of ageing.
No we should not clone full humans because human cloning would bring risks of abuses to human dignity by unscrupulous people. Also if for example a scientist did clone a human how would thee clone emotionally feel. Would the clone feel like a fake person or a human, would he be deined for being a clone, or would he not make friends at school. There also may be physical risks for example To repeat the same thing on humans would be giving both the mother and the potential foetus a high risk of damage. The basic science of fusing the cytoplasm and nucleus to the cell is very poorly understood. How many abnormal babies would have to be produced to get one right? There are t unknowns about physical problems in pregnancy with cloned sheep and cattle to suggest that human cloning experiments would violate normal medical practice. Roslin researchers have said that there is no experiment that could be done to prove the safety of human clonig without casuing serious risk to humans in the process. Then there are also unknown factors of ageing.
